Jacob is a Software Engineer at Spacelift with experience working in high scale distributed systems environments: building storage systems, service meshes, observability infrastructure, and developer experience workflows.

All posts by Jacob Martin - Infrastructure as Code Expert

Jacob Martin

Author title

Spacelift's going to AWS re:Invent in Las Vegas 🚀 🚀

Title category

Get all the latest content on Infrastructure as Code, DevOps, Spacelift features & news directly to your inbox!

Level up your IaC knowledge. Stay up to date with educational devops guides & news in infrastructure as code, cloud & more!

Managing Infrastructure at Scale | Spacelift Blog

Introducing Stack Dependencies v.2  🎉 🎉

applepodcasts

spotify

missionctrl

Welcome to missionCTRL, a show dedicated to exploring the frontiers of modern DevOps. Listen (or watch) as we sit down with the practitioners who are pushing the boundaries of development

General | Spacelift Blog

General

Policy as Code has been a very hot topic recently. It allows you to codify your rules and decision-making to execute them in an automated way. This lets products expose a programmatic, composable language for policies instead of having to build very complex purpose-specific UIs with all options available. One of the most &#8211; if not the most &#8211; popular Policy as Code engines is <a href="https://www.openpolicyagent.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Open Policy Agent</a>, used in many projects, like Kubernetes and Envoy, and also extensively used in Spacelift. It’s open source and uses the Rego language for policy authoring.
Rego, however, is a language that works very differently than most and can be quite unintuitive at first glance. It’s actually more similar to SQL than to common imperative languages like Python. This means that the learning curve can be quite steep. Moreover, copy-paste development will very often not help you understand Rego &#8211; and authoring complicated policies &#8211; better. 
This is precisely why I wrote this article. It’s meant to guide you through some of the fundamental constructs and mechanisms of Rego, especially those that we’ve seen used a lot in the wild so that you can get a better intuitive understanding of how it all fits together and how to author larger, more advanced, policies. This is not aiming to be a complete (or even sizeable) reference, nor is it a Spacelift-specific guide. If you want to go along and play with the examples, the <a href="https://play.openpolicyagent.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Open Policy Agent playground</a> is the best place to do so.

When talking about Rego, I think it’s best to start with decisions. Decisions in Rego are used as the output of policies but also as temporary variables all over the place. They don’t have to be true/false either &#8211; which is one of the common misconceptions! Decisions can be strings, arrays, objects, sets, etc. You can have as many decisions in your policy as you want.
For example, you can have a simple boolean decision with a constant,

or reference a different variable.

So basically normal variable (decision) assignment.
Rego also allows you to use block notation for assignments:

where each line can be an assignment or true/false expression. The result of the whole block will be true only if the expression in each line evaluates to true, letting you build complex rules that use many other decisions and variables inside of them. We can check a bunch of predicates, and only if all checks succeed does the decision come out to be true.
You can also have a decision that’s an OR of two other decisions, like here:

As you can see, a block for a decision can be repeated multiple times, and the decision will be true if any of the blocks evaluate to true.

<ul>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/devops-best-practices" target="_blank" rel="noopener">16 DevOps Best Practices to Follow</a></li>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/drift-detection" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Fixing Infrastructure Drift with IaC Tools</a></li>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/infrastructure-problems-that-spacelift-solves" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;Common Infrastructure Challenges and How to Solve Them&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:513,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;12&quot;:0}">Common Infrastructure Challenges and How to Solve Them</a></li>
</ul>

The above block is very simple and linear, but we can also do something slightly more complicated. Let’s say we have a request path and an array <code>allowed_path_prefixes</code> and want to check if the path matches any prefix. In that case, we can specify an additional variable for the index:

Now, the way this will intuitively work is that rego will choose an <code>i</code>, move to the second line, and if it fails, go back, try another <code>i</code> and so on until it finds an <code>i</code> that leads to all lines being true. If no such <code>i</code> is found, then <code>allow</code> will be <code>null</code> (technically speaking, it will be undefined).
In human terms, you can read this as “set allow to true if, for some value of i, the request path starts with the i’th allowed path prefix,” or, in even more human terms, “set allow to true if the request path starts with any of the allowed path prefixes.”
If you have more such variables, you can add them separated by commas next to the <code>i</code>:

Additionally, if this <code>i</code> is only needed in a single place, like in the above example, you can substitute it with an underscore instead:

We can also take a look at an example that’s closer to Spacelift, where we might want to decide if a commit is worth a Terraform execution or whether it should just be ignored. We get a list of files changed by the commit, and we also have a couple of paths that are of interest to Terraform. Here we’ll check if any of the paths changed starts with one of the interesting paths:

We’re using two underscores in a single line to mean “is there any pair of (affected file, interesting path prefix) such that the file starts with the prefix.”
But wait, there’s no <code>allow</code> rule here? Is that a valid policy? Yes, it is! Policies can have arbitrary sets of decisions, with those decision being of arbitrary types. It’s just that <code>allow</code> based policies are one of the most obvious use cases, but the power of the Rego language extends much further and can be used for all kinds of decisions, as exemplified by the <a href="https://docs.spacelift.io/concepts/policy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">rich selection of policies available in Spacelift</a>.

Decisions can also be specified as sets:

which means “Papaya should be in the allow set if it belongs to the allowed_users list.”
Moreover, with this block notation, you can specify the element as a variable reference from the block itself:

Using just a single block, you can even specify multiple elements of the set, by having multiple evaluation paths that successfully reach the end of the block and each path having a different user variable.

The value in the square brackets can actually be an arbitrary expression referencing the block’s variables, so if we have a policy whose decisions are warnings based on resources changed, we could do the following:

which checks for forbidden resources and displays a pretty warning message if one of them is changed. In this example, you can also see the usage of a set containment check in the last line of the block.

A more advanced feature of rego is that it lets you define custom functions you can use as helpers in your policy. Writing functions is very similar to writing block decisions, but with some minor differences:

You can see we’re specifying a list of arguments, the variable that should be used as the output, and then have a normal block body. The output of the function will be c as long as the function successfully reaches the end of its body.
However, instead of that output variable, we could also, again, have an arbitrary expression, a constant, for instance:

In this case, the function will evaluate to true if the bucket is not public and is encrypted.

All of this has just been a quick overview of the parts of Rego we’ve seen most commonly used. With these building blocks, you should be much better equipped to begin authoring your own policies, whichever project you’re using them with. If you want to learn more, the whole Rego policy language is much bigger, and the best place to dive in is the <a href="https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/latest/policy-language/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Official Open Policy Agent Policy Language documentation</a>.
If you think Rego is cool and would like to play with a product where it’s put front-and-center, we’d love you to take <a href="https://spacelift.io" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Spacelift</a> for a spin! Spacelift policies provide a way to express rules as code, rules that manage your Infrastructure as Code (IaC) environment, and help make common decisions such as login, access, and execution. Policies are based on the Open Policy Agent project and can be defined using Rego. You can learn more about policies <a href="https://docs.spacelift.io/concepts/policy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>.

Spacelift is a flexible orchestration solution for IaC development. It delivers enhanced collaboration, automation and controls to simplify and accelerate the provisioning of cloud based infrastructures.

What is OPA? Open Policy Agent Examples & Tutorial

How Spacelift Can Improve Your Infrastructure as Code

Spacelift in the GitHub Marketplace

A quick overview of the most commonly used parts of the OPA Rego policy language. Learn how to begin authoring your own policies.

114-rego

Open Policy Agent Rego

Introduction to Open Policy Agent (OPA) Rego Language

Check out the Spacelift Engineering blog to discover internal technical architecture posts written by Spacelift's very own engineers. 

Engineering | Spacelift Blog

Engineering

As many others did before and regretted later, we’ve decided to move a big part of our workload from long-running processes to Lambda. That said, we haven’t regretted it a bit. It’s been a breeze so far, even if there are a few shortcomings of Lambda, which are just annoying.
In this blog post, I’ll describe the positive sides, the negatives, and the approach we’ve taken that allowed us to radically simplify our setup, as well as clarify common misconceptions you might have about AWS Lambda development.
But first of all, let’s take a look at…

Our backend is based on two main constructs:
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The server, which exposes GraphQL and REST APIs to the outside world.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The drain, which consumes a bunch of SQS queues to handle asynchronous jobs. Each SQS queue transports several event types, based on a logical separation (webhooks, async jobs, cronjobs, etc.)</li>
</ul>
We have a very asynchronous architecture. The server often emits async jobs instead of doing something by itself, and the drain often emits new events when handling existing ones.
Because we’re a <a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/ci-cd-pipeline" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CI/CD system</a>, our traffic patterns are very unevenly distributed. Sometimes there are few jobs, at other times, somebody creates an avalanche of them.
Until recently, the drain was a long-running process on ECS, reading from multiple SQS queues. Autoscaling in such a situation is fairly hard. The simplest option is to have a separate process per SQS queue, with each process scaled independently. Even doing this would have resulted in paying too much for periods of low traffic, along with handling spikes in traffic too slowly. The diagram below describes that architecture visually:

image2-26

Our Architecture

Also, everything on the backend is written in Go, no exceptions.

Many people think that moving to Lambda requires huge codebase changes and has to result in having a lot of binaries, one for each Lambda Function. That’s actually not necessary. Yes, Lambda does only call the binary without any arguments (and there’s no way to change that to my knowledge &#8211; I tried), but you can provide arbitrary environment variables.
In our case, we have a single <code>spacelift</code> binary that will run the server process if called as <code>spacelift backend server</code>, but if called as plain <code>spacelift</code>, then it assumes it’s being run as a Lambda handler and will take a look into the <code>HANDLER</code> environment variable to deduce which handler to actually run. This way, we can keep using a single binary for everything, and operational simplicity ensues. The following diagram shows the new setup:

image1-27

Changing Our Codebase for Lambda

Lambda can also be quite annoying for local development. The way we solve this is by having all of our handlers &#8211; as you’ve seen above &#8211; fronted by SQS queues. This way we can run the handlers locally, and have a shim that polls the SQS queue (a copy the given developer has), translates it into the Lambda-native SQS message format, and passes that to the handler. Very similar to the way the original setup worked, but just for local development.
In practice, this means we have a <code>spacelift backend local-drain</code> command that just runs all handlers with their respective SQS queue pollers. That gets recompiled on each code change, so the feedback loop from code change to locally deployed new binary is around 5 seconds and you can easily attach a debugger to it.

<ul>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/devops-best-practices" target="_blank" rel="noopener">16 DevOps Best Practices to Follow</a></li>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/ci-cd-tools" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Top Most Useful CI/CD Tools for DevOps</a></li>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/how-specialized-solution-can-improve-your-iac" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;10 Ways to Improve Your Infrastructure as Code&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:513,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;12&quot;:0}">10 Ways to Improve Your Infrastructure as Code</a></li>
</ul>

On ECS, the system we moved from, <a href="https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonECS/latest/developerguide/specifying-sensitive-data-secrets.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">you can just specify a list of environment variables and mark their sources as “to be taken from SecretsManager”</a>. With Lambda, that’s not possible. However, we wanted to keep dependency injection uniform across the codebase, so we wanted to have the same flow in Lambda as before.
Thus, we just pass a plain environment variable with the list of objects to get from SecretsManager. The Lambda binary will get those objects from SecretsManager, iterate over all key values in each, and set them as environment variables on the current process. This happens first-thing after starting, so the rest of our initialization process is oblivious to it. This might sound like a hack, but it’s simple, and it does the job.

Another misconception about Lambda is that Container Image support means it can take arbitrary Docker images and run them as-is. Unfortunately, that’s not true.
Container Images in Lambda basically work as a glorified file archive, nothing more, nothing less. Your binary still has to adhere to the Lambda communication protocol, Although you can still use Docker to build your image. The main difference is that thanks to the improved caching story, they let you use 10 GB images instead of just 50 MB for ZIP archives.
Another difference is that with Container Images you can’t configure Lambda layers to be used through the AWS console, as you can with ZIP archives. That said, you can easily copy layers into your Container Image:

The way your Lambda Function works is that it gets spun up, launches your binary, which can do any setup it wants and then starts polling for jobs from the Lambda runtime. Then, when the Lambda is not needed anymore (scaling down) it gets terminated.
So, you can use goroutines to do some async tasks in your Lambdas while they’re running, right? Well, no.
The Lambda Runtime will actually freeze your process between invocations. This means that if you have an async process doing work between invocations, it might be frozen right after it tries to do an IO operation and be woken up 30 seconds later, which makes the IO operation time out immediately.
In other words, you can’t safely use async processes in your Lambda binaries &#8211; at least not outside a single invocation’s timespan. Also, make sure that your database doesn’t terminate connections if it didn’t get a keepalive in 30 seconds, in case you’re connecting to it directly (which btw. was not an issue for us).

It’s not ideal.
With Lambdas, there is a concept of throttling. It happens when you try to invoke a lot of Lambdas at once, but they can’t scale fast enough. Lambda will then return a 429 error.
So, if you suddenly have lots of SQS messages, the SQS connector will scale up and send lots of invocations which might fail with the 429 error. So, the SQS connector will slow down and retry them in a second, right?
Well, no. Instead of retrying with those most recent messages a moment later, it will actually fail the message handling and put it back to SQS to be handled again after the visibility timeout passes (which might take several minutes). That is not great and can introduce additional delays in times of high traffic.
That said, we haven’t encountered this issue again since setting up high <a href="https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/configuration-concurrency.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">reserved concurrent execution numbers</a> on the Lambda functions. Based on the last few months of usage, this has been a non-issue to us.

With most systems, often “turn it off and back on again” is a quite good incident recovery mechanism. Your code gets into an unexpected state, and this way you reset it.
With Lambda, however, there’s no obvious way to invalidate all the current warm Lambda runtimes. So, if you need this, the way to go is actually to add a useless environment variable, so that you have a change, and then deploy it. Deploying will invalidate old Lambda runtime versions, and effectively  “turn it off and back on again”.

As described in the beginning, we often encounter load spikes, which required us to have many machines on standby before moving to Lambda. With Lambda, this works beautifully out of the box. Whenever we get a huge amount of events at a moment’s notice, Lambda is able to scale up to 10x the capacity, quickly handle all the events, and then scale down.
Moreover, we achieve all of this while having drastically reduced the cost of the whole setup. Lambdas for asynchronous event processing are very cost-effective. I’m not sure I’d recommend them for synchronous HTTP services, but here they definitely do shine.

Lambdas deploy instantaneously. They have perfect isolation &#8211; we don’t have to worry about one Function’s execution influencing any other Function, by starving resources or something similar. Cold starts are very short with Go, warm starts are basically instant. So as far as these considerations are concerned, we’re very happy. 
After migrating to Lambdas, they required very little upkeep, and haven’t been a source of incidents.

Overall, we’re very satisfied with our new setup. I hope the above lessons learned can be useful to somebody else considering the same switch, or planning their greenfield project on Lambda.

Spacelift is an alternative to using homegrown solutions on top of a generic CI. It helps overcome common state management issues and adds several must-have capabilities s for infrastructure management.

How to Manage AWS Lambda Functions with Terraform: Tutorial

Tricking PostgresSQL into Using an Insane - but 200x Faster - Query Plan

Creating a Flexible Backoffice Tool in a Technical Company Using Slack

See the approach we’ve taken that allowed us to simplify our setup and clarify common misconceptions you might have about AWS Lambda development.

89-aws-lambda-land

AWS Lambda Land

Adventures in AWS Lambda Land - a Migration Gone Well

tricking Postgres into using an insane - but 200x faster - query plan

At Spacelift, we use PostgreSQL (specifically Aurora Serverless) for most of our primary database needs. Our application query patterns are mostly small transactions that touch a few rows &#8211; a typical scenario that PostgreSQL handles without breaking a sweat.
We also use Datadog as a monitoring solution. Their agent has a handy feature to create metrics based on periodically executed SQL queries, allowing us to build smart and highly contextual monitors and alerts. Occasionally, such queries might be slow and dominate the processing time of the database. After hooking up Datadog Database monitoring, we identified a lot of slow queries and moved most of them to a separate Redshift cluster. There they execute once per day on a periodic snapshot of the database.
However, a number of these queries need to happen at a more frequent interval as they can detect alertable conditions. We couldn’t move these queries to Redshift because of the staleness of the data there. Aurora Serverless also doesn’t support read replicas to offload analytical queries to them, so no luck there either. Thus, we had to optimize, add indices, optimize, and again optimize until we cut the database usage of these metric-creating queries by 1-2 orders of magnitude.
This article will show you one such optimization story, which is interesting because both the before and after query plans will look somewhat ridiculous (in terms of cost). Moreover, it shows how PostgreSQL row count estimation can go very wrong. In this case, domain knowledge will help us trick PostgreSQL into a different query plan which will be waaay faster, without adding any additional indices.

Spacelift is a CI/CD platform specializing in Infrastructure as Code. Users create Runs (executions of, i.e., Terraform) which will be executed on Worker Pools. There is a public shared Worker Pool managed by Spacelift and private Worker Pools that users can host for themselves. 
Each Run belongs to a Stack, which can be thought of as a single environment, managing a bunch of infrastructure resources. If you know Terraform or CloudFormation, a single Stack maps to a single Terraform state file or a CloudFormation root stack, respectively.
A Run can have one of many types: Tracked, Proposed, and others. That type determines what the overall workflow will look like.

The query is supposed to notify us when the public Worker Pool cannot handle demand &#8211; user Runs are waiting too long to be handled by a Worker.

That’s a big query! What’s happening here?
We’re interested in the number of Runs (as well as the age of the oldest one) which are of the Proposed or Testing type (can be scheduled right away &#8211; other Run types require exclusiveness), are in the Queued state (which means they’re not yet being processed) and don’t have a Worker attached to them (are still waiting for one).
We only want Runs on Accounts that are far from their parallelism limit to reduce the number of false positives caused by users being correctly limited. So for each Run, we count the number of active Runs on its account and check if it&#8217;s under 50% of the parallelism limit, and only then do we count this Run as properly pending.
Unfortunately, that query lasts 20 seconds and consumes 50% of our database&#8217;s processing time. That’s pretty bad.

Let’s take a look at the query plan. I’ll be using <a href="https://explain.dalibo.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://explain.dalibo.com</a> to visualize query plans. To get the query plan, I’m executing it prefixed with EXPLAIN (FORMAT JSON, ANALYZE) … so we can also see information about the query’s actual execution (ANALYZE).

image5-8

visualization of query plans

What can we see here?
On the left side, we’re joining Worker Pools with Stacks. We also calculate the number of active Runs for each Account using the SubPlan. We do a three-way hash join on the (Worker Pool, Stack) tuples, the Accounts, and the SubPlan results based on the Account ID. Then we loop over all those triples and get the pending Runs for each, finally counting all the pending Runs found.
The SubPlan goes over all Stacks in an Account, and for each Stack gets the active Runs for it (the ones where worker_id is not NULL).
Let’s look at the time distribution of the plan nodes.

image4-8

time distribution of the plan nodes

We can see that the most expensive part of this query is the Bitmap Index Scan which looks for Runs whose worker_id is not NULL, so let’s take a closer look at that part of the query plan.
For each Stack in the SubPlan, we look for active Runs on it. How do we do that?

image1-8

Bitmap

We scan the runs_worker_id index for storage pages containing Runs with a non-empty worker_id and the run_stack_id index for the pages containing Runs for the current Stack. Then we AND these together &#8211; we only want pages present in both of these scans. Finally, we scan the actual Runs from the pages and only take the ones that satisfy the predicates (pages found by the index may contain both relevant and irrelevant Runs).

image2-8

bitmap index scan

In a different tab of the left Index Scan, we can see the root of the problem. We made 531358 loops over this, and we expected to scan 120 mil Runs over the whole processing of the query here, but we scanned 800 mils. That’s much more.
But later in the Heap Scan of the ANDed pages, we see a gross overestimation.

image6-4

bitmap heap scan

We expected to scan 2 mil rows but scanned 42 overall, which means no Runs were executing on most Stacks at this instant.
Overall, it’s mostly this subquery being very expensive:

Now comes the domain knowledge. Is there something we know the optimizer seems not to…? Yes!
Only a minuscule part of the Runs in the database are active at any given time. Most Stacks stay dormant most of the time. Whenever a user makes a commit, only the affected Stacks will execute Runs. There will obviously be Stacks that are constantly in use, but most won’t. Moreover, intensive users will usually use private Worker Pools. The public shared Worker Pool is predominantly utilized by smaller users, so that’s another reason for not seeing many Runs here.
Right now, we’re iterating over all existing Stacks attached to the public worker pool and getting relevant Runs for each. How about we flipped that? We know there are at most as many active Runs as there are public Workers &#8211; orders of magnitude fewer than there are Stacks. Overall active Runs (not just the ones on the public Worker Pool) are also way less numerous, at most as many as there are Workers overall (and since the number of private Workers is the main dimension we currently base our Enterprise tier pricing on, query processing time being linearly correlated with the number of Workers is OK). Thus, we could get all active Runs and filter to just those whose Stack uses the public Worker Pool.
The only problem is, we’re working with a fairly opaque query optimizer, and PostgreSQL doesn’t have any way to give hints to it &#8211; like forcing a join strategy. So we’ll have to do that differently. We’ll create a query that scans the active Runs and then uses another subquery to filter them to just the ones related to a relevant Stack. Then we’ll have to hope the query is opaque enough for Postgres not to get too clever with it.

This query does exactly what we described. Scan active Runs, filter to just those with more than 0 Stacks in the current account and connected to the public Worker Pool. There would be either 1 or 0 such Stacks for each Run.
Executing this query, we get down to 100ms instead of the original 20s. That’s a vast improvement. What does the query plan say? (apologies for the long vertical picture)

image3-8

What does the query plan say?

Exactly what we wanted! It scans active Runs, and for each of them, checks (using a primary key index lookup &#8211; fast!) whether the Stack it belongs to is relevant.
That’s it! The whole optimized query now looks like this:

Thanks for reading! The moral of this story is that query plans aren’t that hard to interpret with the right tools. Using your domain knowledge, you can rewrite your queries to achieve substantial performance boosts without adding unnecessary indices or denormalizing the data model.

Spacelift is an alternative to using homegrown solutions on top of a generic CI. It helps overcome common state management issues and adds several must-have capabilities for infrastructure management.

Managing Azure Resources using Spacelift

Running Spacelift CI/CD workers in Kubernetes using DinD

Building a Secure CI/CD Integration with Azure

At Spacelift, we use PostgreSQL (specifically Aurora Serverless) for most of our primary database needs. This article will show you our optimization story and how PostgreSQL row count estimation can go very wrong.

50-tricking-postgres

Tricking PostgresSQL into Using 200x Faster Query Plan

Working on a SaaS product, you’ll occasionally have to take administrative actions to assist a user or help them debug an issue. Maybe something is misconfigured, and they need a hand, or possibly they just want another week in their trial.
If you’re using something like Django, then you get a nice built-in admin UI based on your model definition, and that’s it &#8211; you have a great tool at your disposal by default. Even though you still need to carefully design the access flow, as they otherwise commonly become attack vectors.
If, however, you’re building a project in a custom way akin to “let’s combine many libraries and build exactly what we need” instead, then all you’ll have is the raw query language interface of your database &#8211; and that only if you’re lucky enough to have chosen a database which supports non-trivial querying.
In the long run, though, as most developers know, running SQL queries on prod isn’t really a scalable or secure approach and requires significant coordination, communication, and supervision in order not to accidentally corrupt your data. You also have to limit access to a few select individuals and have to manage access to sensitive data.
Moreover, you might have other dependencies than the SQL database. Then administering all the third-party services would require you to jump around various admin UIs, making everything even more complicated and error prone&#8230;

There’s a whole class of tools tailored specifically to solving this use case &#8211; WYSIWYG back office tools. Using one of these tools, you can easily create dialogs with SQL queries underneath and connect them directly to your database. Depending on the tool, it might even be usable by non-technical people.
Unfortunately, these tools also bring a whole class of problems with them, mainly access management &#8211; both for people and for the tool itself. You can use a cloud-based, managed tool, but then you have to give it arbitrary querying access to your internal production database. This usually makes sense but is a security consideration that you have to take into account.
You can also use self-hosted open source tools, but these come with their own set of trade-offs:
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">You have to self-host them, costing you precious time.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">They need to have access to your production database, and people in your organization need to have access to them. So you either make them publicly accessible (and trust their security) or you make them internally accessible and set up limited internal network access for everybody who needs to use them.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Access-management in the tool itself.</li>
</ul>
Other than that, one common disadvantage is that they’re yet another tool you’ll have to use in your day-to-day work. They are also usually optimized for working with a SQL database, not additional third-party services.
After comparing various solutions on both sides of the cloud/open-source divide, we’ve decided we didn’t like either set of trade-offs, which put a hold on the whole initiative for a while.
Then we had an idea… What’s the most popular DevOps administration and management tool? Slack of course! I’m slightly joking, but the ChatOps trend&#8217;s significance cannot be denied. In this case, it did indeed look like it could solve all our problems.

Slack is great for a few reasons:
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">It’s a textual interface &#8211; almost a terminal really &#8211; so you can transfer a lot of UX knowledge from your terminal experiences. Developers are always happy to use a text interface.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">You already manage access to Slack channels, so you can piggyback on top of that and only make your tool available in select channels. This way, you don’t have to build additional access management for your tooling.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">If you design the UX well, it’s very easy to use for non-technical users.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">You automatically have a public audit log of all executed commands &#8211; the channel message history.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">You already use Slack.</li>
</ul>
It does have its disadvantages too:
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">When Slack is dead (which hasn’t been a rare occurrence in recent times), you can’t access your back office tool. But that’s ok as long as you keep your most critical maintenance commands available through alternative access channels.</li>
</ul>
Now for some Slack technicalities. For a project like this, you can use slash commands or a slackbot. The gist of it is that slash commands are more structured, but also more limited.
Slackbots on the other hand, just interact with your channels like a normal user would, so the flexibility is limitless, but it requires more work on your side. In order to provide an experience that’s as user-friendly and magical as possible, we went with the slackbot approach.
And thus the Backoffice Bot was born…

slackbot1

hello Backoffice Bot

Internally, we already had an event handling system in place for application events &#8211; i.e. GitHub push notifications. We actually even have a <a href="https://docs.spacelift.io/integrations/chatops/slack" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Slack integration</a>, so there was ample opportunity for copy-paste driven development.
In practice though, it’s pretty simple. There’s an AWS API Gateway endpoint to handle Slack webhooks. It puts events on an SQS queue, and then a handler which has access to all relevant production systems takes care of handling each message and potentially responding to it.

slackbot2

building the Slackbot

One more advantage of the slackbot using our existing event handling framework, is that we not only have access to our SQL database, we also have access to any third-party products we use, like various AWS offerings.
<h3>The Router Structure</h3>
All commands are registered with a message pattern, which is then converted into a regular expression with capture groups for the arguments. Here is an example code block specifying a command with its handler:

Initially, we planned to make it a sophisticated <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trie" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">trie</a>-based router, but that’s just immensely more complex than going over a list of regular expressions and trying to match each. With this amount of traffic and number of commands there was simply no point in optimizing further.
This way of adding commands is really simple, and there’s a bonus &#8211; an automatically generated <code>@Backoffice Bot help</code> message which dynamically lists and describes all commands available in the current channel.
<h3>Approval Flow</h3>
With processes like these, oftentimes, you want certain commands to require approval. We do this by using Slack reactions. 
The Slackbot will first detail what it would like to do (dry-run so to say) and then ask for approval. Approval is required from the caller, as well as a predefined number of other people, which depends on the “destructiveness” of the command at hand.

slackbot3

slackbot approval flow

In order not to double-execute commands, we’re marking handled messages using a Slack reaction &#8211; this way we don’t have to use an external database. You can see this in the above picture with the Spacelift logo reaction on the root message.
<h3>Access Control</h3>
One additional requirement was that different commands are allowed to be executed by different people. In our case, there are commands which are built for non-technical people, for example extending account trials; as well as commands built for technical people, for example displaying diagnostic information or cycling a worker pool’s workers.
We achieve this by limiting the available commands based on the channel. We have a #backoffice channel for non-technical people and a #backoffice-developers channel for technical people. They are private, so we can limit access levels by inviting select people to relevant channels.
The help message takes this into account and only shows the commands available to you in the current channel.

Everybody using our new Backoffice Bot has quickly fallen in love with it. Adding new commands follows the same process as getting standard product changes into production, which is familiar to all developers out of the box. There are no additional tools, workflows, or processes to maintain. We definitely recommend this approach if you ever find yourself having similar challenges to solve.
Read more about working on our product: <a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/aws-lambda-migration" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Adventures in AWS Lambda Land – a Migration Gone Well</a>.

slackbot4

slackbot

Spacelift is an alternative to using homegrown solutions on top of a generic CI solution. It allows you to automate, audit, secure, and continuously deliver your infrastructure.

Introducing the Spacelift Azure Integration!

Learn how to create a flexible back office tool using Slack. See how to make work day easier for technical and non-technical folk.

26-backoffice_slacbot

flexible Backoffice Tool

Creating a flexible Backoffice Tool in a Technical Company using Slack

provision an AWS EKS Kubernetes cluster with Terraform

Want to level up your Kubernetes knowledge? Explore our tutorials and step-by-step guides written by Kubernetes experts. Learn Kubernetes best practices and solutions to the most difficult problems.

Kubernetes Guides and Tutorials | Spacelift Blog

Kubernetes

Want to level up your Terraform knowledge? Explore our tutorials and step-by-step guides written by Terraform experts. Learn Terraform best practices and solutions to the most difficult problems.

Terraform Guides and Tutorials | Spacelift Blog

Terraform

Flavius Dinu

AWS EKS provides managed <a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/kubernetes-cluster" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kubernetes clusters</a> as a service. You’re on AWS and want to avoid getting into the details of setting up a Kubernetes cluster from scratch? EKS is the way to go!
In this guide, you will learn how to provision an AWS EKS Kubernetes cluster with Terraform. Let&#8217;s start with the basics.

AWS EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service) is a managed service from AWS that makes Kubernetes cluster management easier to implement and scale. It provides a reliable and scalable platform to run Kubernetes workloads, allowing engineers to focus on building applications while AWS takes care of managing the underlying Kubernetes infrastructure.

Using Terraform with AWS EKS provides many benefits, from streamlining the process of provisioning to configuring and managing your Kubernetes clusters. Managing the lifecycle of a service through Infrastructure as Code, it’s usually a very good idea, as you will configure that service faster, while minimizing the potential for human error.

First, locally <a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/how-to-install-terraform" target="_blank" rel="noopener">install Terraform</a>:

as well as the AWS CLI:

and kubectl:

If you’re on a different operating system, please find the respective installation instructions here:
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Terraform: <a href="https://learn.hashicorp.com/tutorials/terraform/install-cli" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://learn.hashicorp.com/tutorials/terraform/install-cli</a></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">awscli: <a href="https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cli/latest/userguide/install-cliv2.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cli/latest/userguide/install-cliv2.html</a></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">kubectl: <a href="https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/tools/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/tools/</a></li>
</ul>

Now, you’ll need to configure your AWS CLI with access credentials to your AWS account. You can do this by running

and providing your Access Key ID and Secret Access Key. You will also need to add the region. For the purposes of this guide, we will use us-east-2. Terraform will later use these credentials to provision your AWS resources.

You can now clone a repository which contains everything you need to set up EKS:

Inside you’ll see a few files, the main one being eks-cluster.tf:

It uses the EKS Terraform module to set up an EKS cluster with 2 worker groups (the actual nodes running your workloads): one with a single medium machine, and one with two small machines.

You can now create all of those resources using Terraform. First, run

to initialize the <a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/terraform-workspaces" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Terraform workspace</a> and download any <a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/what-are-terraform-modules-and-how-do-they-work" target="_blank" rel="noopener">modules</a> and providers which are used.
In order to do a dry run of the changes to be made, run

This will show you that 51 resources will be added, as well as their relevant details. You can then run terraform apply with the resulting plan, in order to actually provision the resources:

This may take a few minutes to finish. You might get a “timed out” error, in which case just repeat both the terraform plan and terraform apply steps.
In the end you will get a list of outputs with their respective values printed out. Make note of your cluster_name.

In order to use kubectl, which is the main tool to interact with a Kubernetes cluster, you have to give it credentials to your EKS Kubernetes cluster. You can do this by running

Make sure to replace &lt;output.cluster_name&gt; with the relevant value from your Terraform apply outputs.

<ul>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/terraform-environments" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;Managing Multiple Terraform Environments Efficiently&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:513,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;12&quot;:0}">Managing Multiple Terraform Environments Efficiently</a></li>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/terraform-automation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">How to Automate Terraform Deployments and Infrastructure Provisioning</a></li>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/5-ways-to-manage-terraform-at-scale" target="_blank" rel="noopener">5 Ways to Manage Terraform at Scale</a></li>
</ul>

You can now view the nodes of your cluster by running

This command is so long because it displays custom columns, thanks to which we can indeed see that there are 2 smaller nodes, and 1 bigger node.
Let’s deploy an Nginx instance to see if the cluster is working correctly.

You can see the status of it by running:

And finally set up a tunnel from your computer to this pod:

If you open <a href="http://localhost:3000" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://localhost:3000</a> in your browser, you should see the web server greet you:

welcome to ngix

In order to destroy the resources we’ve created in this session, run

This may again take up to a few minutes. You can read more about it here: <a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/how-to-destroy-terraform-resources" target="_blank" rel="noopener">How to Delete Resources from Terraform Using the Destroy Command.</a>

I hope this guide helped you on your Kubernetes journey on AWS! If you want more help managing your Terraform state file, building more complex workflows based on Terraform, and <a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/self-service-infrastructure-with-spacelift" target="_blank" rel="noopener">create self-service infrastructure</a>, check out <a href="https://spacelift.io" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Spacelift</a>. We’d love to have you!
Note: New versions of Terraform will be placed under the BUSL license, but everything created before version 1.5.x stays open-source. <a href="https://opentofu.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">OpenTofu</a> is an open-source version of Terraform that will expand on Terraform’s existing concepts and offerings. It is a viable alternative to HashiCorp’s Terraform, being forked from Terraform version 1.5.6. OpenTofu retained all the features and functionalities that had made Terraform popular among developers while also introducing improvements and enhancements. OpenTofu is the future of the Terraform ecosystem, and having a truly open-source project to support all your IaC needs is the main priority.

Spacelift helps manage Terraform state, build more complex workflows, supports policy as code, programmatic configuration, context sharing, drift detection, resource visualization and many more.

Initialize/ plan/ apply your IaC, manage modules, state, and more. 

frame-8479

Frame 8479

Importing Existing Infrastructure Into Terraform - Step by Step

5 Ways to Manage Terraform at Scale - Best Practices

Learn how to provision an AWS EKS Kubernetes cluster with Terraform. See a full step-by-step tutorial.

10-provision-kubernetes-cluster

Provisioning AWS EKS Cluster with Terraform - Tutorial

Occasionally you might want to rename an AWS S3 bucket you are managing with Terraform. However, names of S3 buckets are immutable, which means you can’t change them directly. If you tried, Terraform would destroy the old one and then create a new one, resulting in data loss.
To avoid this, you need to create a new bucket with the desired name, move the data over to it, make the relevant Terraform state replacements, and finally delete the old bucket.
In this post you will learn how to rename an AWS S3 bucket in <a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/what-is-terraform" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Terraform</a>. First things first &#8211; let’s say you have a bucket definition in your Terraform code:

and you want to change the name of the bucket to <code>new-name</code>.

Firstly, we’ll need to <a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/terraform-aws-s3-bucket" target="_blank" rel="noopener">create a new bucket</a>. You can do this using the AWS CLI or the <a href="https://docs.aws.amazon.com/awsconsolehelpdocs/latest/gsg/console-help-gsg.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">AWS console</a>. Just make sure to properly replicate the old settings, especially the ACL (so that your data doesn’t accidentally become public).
Now, we can copy all the files from the old to the new bucket:

Now that we have our new bucket, we need to remove the old one from our Terraform state and <a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/importing-exisiting-infrastructure-into-terraform" target="_blank" rel="noopener">import</a> the new one in its place:

If you tried to run Terraform now, it would show you that there’s drift—and yes, there would be! We’ve just imported a bucket into a resource which still has <code>old-name</code> in the config.

That’s why we now have to finally change the name of the bucket in our Terraform config:

If you run Terraform now, you’ll see that there are no changes to be made.

<ul>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/terraform-best-practices" target="_blank" rel="noopener">20 Best Practices for Using Terraform</a></li>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/terraform-automation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">How to Automate Terraform Deployments and Infrastructure Provisioning</a></li>
<li><a href="https://spacelift.io/blog/how-specialized-solution-can-improve-your-iac" target="_blank" rel="noopener">How to Improve Your Infrastructure as Code using Terraform</a></li>
</ul>

If you want to, you can now delete your old bucket using:

Make sure all the data has successfully been copied over to the new bucket.

If you’re using Spacelift then you can use <a href="https://docs.spacelift.io/concepts/run/task" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tasks</a> to run the above arbitrary AWS CLI commands. The default runner image already contains the AWS CLI, so no changes are necessary there.
One additional thing you can do is <a href="https://docs.spacelift.io/concepts/stack/stack-locking" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lock the Stack</a> while you’re running the migration, this way nobody will accidentally run Terraform or make any other changes while you’re moving the data.
And that’s it! If you have any questions about how to rename an AWS S3 bucket, drop me a line in the comments and I’ll get back to you straight away.
Note: New versions of Terraform will be placed under the BUSL license, but everything created before version 1.5.x stays open-source. <a href="https://opentofu.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">OpenTofu</a> is an open-source version of Terraform that will expand on Terraform’s existing concepts and offerings. It is a viable alternative to HashiCorp’s Terraform, being forked from Terraform version 1.5.6. OpenTofu retained all the features and functionalities that had made Terraform popular among developers while also introducing improvements and enhancements. OpenTofu is the future of the Terraform ecosystem, and having a truly open-source project to support all your IaC needs is the main priority.

If you are struggling with Terraform automation and management, check out Spacelift. It helps you manage Terraform state, build more complex workflows, and adds several must-have capabilities for end-to-end infrastructure management.

Terraform Taint, Untaint, Replace - How to Use It (Examples)

Bootstrap Complete Amazon EKS Clusters with EKS Blueprints for Terraform

Learn how to rename an AWS S3 bucket in Terraform. See renaming process of Amazon s3 bucket in a few simple steps.

Jacob Martin

Introduction to Open Policy Agent (OPA) Rego Language

Get the newsletter

Recent posts

Adventures in AWS Lambda Land – a Migration Gone Well

Tricking PostgresSQL into Using an Insane – but 200x Faster – Query Plan

Creating a Flexible Backoffice Tool in a Technical Company Using Slack

Provisioning AWS EKS Cluster with Terraform – Tutorial

How to Rename an AWS S3 Bucket in Terraform – Step by Step